Best Free Book About God "Missing Links?" Part 2 Chapter 4

IV

MISSING LINKS?

 The Lie: Humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

 

According to the theory of evolution, the first true man evolved from a common ancestor of the ape anywhere from one to three million years ago.  This common ancestor has never been found but evolutionists claim to have found several transitional forms of man’s development from this common ancestor to his current physical status.

Almost every grammar school child has seen pictures that depict the gradual evolution of man from a pre-historic ape-like brute to his present physical state.  Therefore, it is assumed by most students that science has obtained enough evidence to justify this common portrayal of man’s development.  Few students realize that such a portrayal is based almost entirely upon theory and not upon fact.  The minor variations found in ancient human skeletal fragments and parts can hardly justify the evolutionary picture of man’s development.

The reconstruction of man or beast from fragmentary skeletal structures is highly speculative and is often influenced by pre-conceived evolutionary ideas.  It is difficult to ascertain exact thicknesses of the tissues that cover the bone, or to determine amounts and locations of body hair.  This fact becomes obvious through observing the vast differences found in the pictorial renderings of ancient “ancestors” that have been derived from the exact same bone fragments. It is true that some of the fossils that were once thought to be “ancestral man” had some very obvious physical differences and characteristics not found in modern man; however, these were later determined to be the remains of apes and not men at all.  History has demonstrated a repetition of gross error in the reconstruction of ancestral man from ancient skeletal parts.  This error has mainly stemmed from the biased anticipation of evolutionists who were overly anxious to prove their beloved theory at any cost.

For example, in 1926, a skull cap was discovered in Java that was determined to be a skull belonging to one of the famous “missing links” known as “Pithecanthropus Erectus.”  After the publicity and impact of this discovery died down, the skull was later determined to be the knee cap of an elephant!¹

In one case, a bone was discovered in Seattle that was heralded to be an ancient human fibula, but, later was identified as being part of a bear’s hind leg.³ In another incident, a tooth was discovered in Nebraska that was proclaimed to be the tooth of another “missing link” known as “Hesperopithecus.”  Authorities were so positive about their find that they introduced the tooth as court room evidence in the famous “Scopes Evolution Trial” in Tennessee.  However, two years after the trial, the tooth of this famous “Nebraska Man” was determined to be the tooth of an extinct pig!²  The history of evolution is laden with such blunders.

UPDATE: Some sources that are cited in the reference section of this book, indicated that the tooth mentioned above was introduced as courtroom evidence in the Scopes Trial. This statement is erroneous. However, the tooth was an important factor affecting the trial. Here are some more details about the trial and the infamous tooth: 

The famous Scopes Evolution Trial in 1925 provides a striking example of just how ludicrous some of the “missing link” discoveries of the past have been. The Scopes trial was purposely staged to bring national attention to the controversial theory of evolution. John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act which forbade teachers from teaching human evolution in publicly funded classrooms. The prosecution was lead by three-time presidential candidate, William Jennings Bryan while the famous defense lawyer, Clarence Darrow, represented John Scopes. During a two year period preceding the trial, there was a scientific and public debate taking place over the discovery of a single tooth in Nebraska that was determined to be the tooth of a prehistoric human ancestor known as “Hesperopithicus” or “Nebraska Man.” This discovery was useful in promoting public acceptance of the theory of evolution and included conceptual drawings of an ape-like human and his entire family. This single tooth discovery was one of several factors that were instrumental in bringing about the Scopes trial and William Jennings Bryan expected the discoverer of the tooth to be called as a witness for the defense since so many people considered it to be evidence of man’s evolution. The discovery of the infamous “Nebraska Man” tooth influenced the events of the trial but it was never actually entered as official evidence in the trial. About two years after the trial, Nebraska Man’s tooth was determined to be the tooth of an extinct pig! History is laden with such erroneous “proofs” of evolution which, in some cases, have been nothing but frauds and hoaxes. 

Two separate discoveries in Colorado also caused a great amount of embarrassment within the evolutionist community.  One of these discoveries involved the reconstruction of a man from another single tooth that turned out to be a horse tooth.⁴The other blunder was made when a small “ape-man” skull was discovered and put on display in a museum.  This “museum piece” turned out to be the skull of a pet monkey that had been buried just ‘a few years previously.⁵

In 1912, a jawbone and part of a skull were discovered in Piltdown, England.  However the famous “Piltdown Man” (also known as “Dawn Man”) lost his credibility when it was learned forty years later that he was the product of a brilliant hoax.  The skeletal fragments had been deliberately tampered with in order to give the appearance of great age.  Apparently, human teeth of the relatively young jawbone had been replaced by ape’s teeth.⁶ Isn’t it incredible to think that such a deception went undetected by leading evolutionary authorities for almost forty years?

In spite of the many mistakes of the past, most people are under the impression that today’s evolutionary discoveries are much more credible because of modern scientific and technological advancements.  However, the unfortunate reality is that most modern discoveries and evaluations are still influenced by biased judgments.  The evolutionist is convinced that man evolved; therefore, any variations in skeletal structures from present day “species” are often hastily considered to represent stages of man’s evolution.  The evidence from which evolutionists make these hasty determinations is usually fragmentary and incomplete.

Some of the most important discoveries consist of nothing more than partial skull caps or jaw fragments.  Because of this, the premature identification of “ancestral human fossils” has often resulted in a later re-classification due to discoveries of additional fossil evidence of the same type.  For example, several different “species” that were once considered to be primitive forms of man have been re-classified as “homo sapien” (modern man) due to the increase of fossil evidence from around the world.⁷ Conversely, some of the very earliest forms of “ancestral man” are now considered by many evolutionists to be nothing more than ancient apes.⁸

Since so many errors have been made in classifying ancient skeletal parts, one of the most crucial concerns of anthropological research should be the careful and unbiased identification or determination of these ancient skeletal remains; however, prejudicial judgments still abound.

Ne’r the Twain Shall Meet

 

The creationist realizes that limited physical variations exist within “mankind” and within “ape-kind” but he is convinced that there never was a time when the two different groups ever intersected.  The creationist believes that man and ape have always been two distinct kinds and have experienced limited genetic variations that have never crossed the divine boundaries that separate one kind from another.

In our modern world there are various differences among species of the ape categories, just as there are certain physiological differences between the various races of men.  However, any physiological differences that exist among the races of modern man do not mean that any particular group is “more human” than another.  These physical differences that exist between men of different races and geographical locations merely demonstrate the concept of limited variation within a particular “kind.”

Even though there are certain physical similarities between the skeletal structures of modern man and modern ape; it is, nevertheless, quite evident that man and ape are still two very distinct and separate “kinds.”  Few people realize that the whole concept of ancient men having ape-like characteristics is based almost entirely upon erroneous and/or premature evaluations of fragmentary evidence.  Too many times this has proven to be the case throughout the history of the theory of evolution.  Whenever sufficient fossil evidence does exist, the creationist believes that all “missing links” can be classified as either 100 percent man or 100 percent ape.  This is not a presumptuous belief because there have been recent developments in the evolutionist community that lend credence to this idea.

Rama Who?

 

One such development involves a shift in the attitude of certain evolutionists concerning the significance of a “15 million year old” ape-like creature known as “Ramapithecus.”  This important creature is believed to have been a pre-human form of man’s development from the mysterious common ancestor.  This claim has been boldly made in spite of the fact that the only fossil evidence for Ramapithecus consists of a partial jaw and a few teeth.⁹

Several comparisons have been made between the dental measurements of Ramapithecus and other species of approximately the same age that are considered to be true apes.  The comparisons revealed that the variation between the dental measurements of Ramapithecus and the fossil apes was less than the variations that exist between dental measurements that were taken from within a group of living chimpanzees.¹⁰ Some of the “human” characteristics of the Jaw and teeth of Ramapithecus are also found in the teeth of a living, high altitude baboon known as Theropithecus Galada.¹¹ However, the Galada baboon is certainly not on the evolutionary road to manhood.

Since the fossil record contains many extinct forms of a variety of modern animals, it is safe to assume that Ramapithecus is nothing more than an extinct ape.  Indeed, this is precisely what some of the foremost evolutionists in the world have also concluded.¹²

 

The First Flower Children

 

The significance of other famous “missing links” has somewhat eroded in the past decade.  Consider the case of the famous “Neanderthal Man” who was always portrayed as a brutish individual with a slumped posture and an extremely primitive lifestyle. The fact is, since more skeletal remains of “Homo Neanderthal sis” have been recently discovered, anthropologists have had to re-classify him and place him in the category of “Homo sapien” (modern man).¹³ Because of obtaining more skeletal evidence, it has been learned that “Neanderthal man” had a brain capacity that was equal to and sometimes greater than that of modern man.¹⁴ Any physical differences found were no greater than the physical differences that exist among the various races of modern man.  Furthermore, most anthropologists believe that his stooped posture was probably caused by arthritis or rickets because his diet was definitely lacking in vitamin D.¹⁵ If Neanderthal man had stood erect, he would not have been distinguishable from modern man.

It has also been learned that the Neanderthal culture was not so primitive.  It is now known that Neanderthal man painted pictures, made fine tools and implements, practiced religion and even raised flowers.¹⁶ His culture was no more primitive than certain “uncivilized” cultures that exist today in our modern world.  Most people agree that cultural differences do not make one person any more or any less human than another person because the young children of a present day “cave man” could be placed in a more technologically advanced society and would have the same capacity for learning as any other child in the advanced society.

The well-known “Cro-Magnon man,” “Heidelberg man” and several others are also proving to be much more modern in appearance than originally portrayed.¹⁷ It is now known that the Cro-Magnon man was superior to modern man in physical size and brain capacity.  Also, the “pre-human” jawbone characteristics of “Heidelberg man” have been duplicated in certain modern races.¹⁸  Many of these missing links” have been pictured for years as ape-like brutes when in fact, their characteristics were no different than those that are found among modern people of different races.

“Southern” Exposure

 

Some of the more substantial “proofs” of evolution have been obtained through the past efforts of Louis Leakey and the more recent efforts of his son Richard Leakey.  Many fossils have been recovered by these men, mostly in East Africa, that have been assigned to a group known as the “Australopithecines.”  Australopithecines means “Southern Ape” and the first fossil of this type was discovered in 1924 by Raymond Dart who believed that his new discovery was truly a “missing link” of the ancestral chain that lead to the development of modern man.  Since the time of the discovery, Louis and Richard Leakey have discovered additional fossils of this type that have lead many evolutionists to conclude that Australopithecus lived about two to three million years ago, that he walked erect and probably had crude tools.  However, his brain was definitely much smaller than that of modern man because his cranial capacity was only 500 cc (which is the same as that of certain apes).

There have been two fairly recent developments which have served to contradict the popular picture of Australopithecus.  In the past, there had been a scarcity of limb bone fossils of Australopithecus.  Richard Leakey, however, accumulated additional limb bone fossils which lead him to the conclusion that Australopithecus had short legs, long arms and probably walked on his knuckles.*  One might conclude, therefore, by inductive reasoning that if Australopithecus walked like an ape, had arms and legs like an ape, and the brain of an ape, there is a good possibility that he was nothing more than an ape.  Some of the “human-like” characteristics of the teeth and jaw of Australopithecus are also similar to those of the high altitude Galada baboon.¹⁹ Chances are that this important “missing link” will one day have to be re-classified as a true ape.

There is one more development which has been devastating to the common evolutionary image of Australopithecus and others.  At Lake Rudolf in north Kenya, Richard Leakey discovered a completely human skull which dates back almost three million years (by evolutionary methods of course).²⁰ Some limb bone fossils were also discovered which indicate that this human walked fully erect.²¹  This discovery has been detrimental to the whole ancestral chain of evolution because it provides evidence that a 100 percent human being was living as long ago as Australopithecus which means that Australopithecus could hardly be an ancestor of modern man if modern man was already around when he was.  The whole evolutionary chain of development, which leads to Australopithecus and then on to later “species,” must therefore, be erroneous.

There have been other “modern” skulls discovered which have also pre-dated the early “ancestors” of evolution.  Some of these were found in undisturbed Pliocene strata and were well-documented at the time of their discovery.²² Unfortunately, since such discoveries do not fit into the evolutionary framework, they have often been ignored or explained away and then forgotten.

"Higher Learning"

 

The evolutionists encounter their greatest difficulties when they try to explain the origins of human language, races, and religions in terms of evolution.  The greatest observable difference between man and animal is human speech. There are over 3,000 different languages in the world; all of which are extremely complicated.  The most “primitive” languages today and throughout history are usually more complicated than those of the “civilized” world.²³ Man has the unique ability to communicate abstract thoughts with articulate, symbolic sounds.  The infinite chasm between the chattering of animals and the articulate speech of humans is admitted, by some evolutionary authorities, to be an unsolvable mystery.²⁴ The noises of animals only reflect their emotions or physical conditions;  Whereas human beings are able to communicate abstract thoughts and human reasoning.  Some animals have been taught to mimic some of the symbolic sounds of man but it is interesting to note that there is not a single mammal which is capable of imitating human speech.²⁵ It would seem that if man is a “higher mammal,” there should be other mammals capable of at least making human noises, even though they obviously, like all animals, could never be taught to communicate or think on man’s infinitely superior level.

Many animals are taught some very remarkable and seemingly intelligent traits, but they can only acquire this knowledge through man’s efforts and training.  They are totally incapable of passing on this information to their progeny.  The ability of man to pass on newly acquired information from one generation to the next is another attribute which distinctly separates him from animals.  The technological advancement of mankind in no way reflects that he is continually evolving toward higher levels of life.  Instead technology argues against evolution because it demonstrates man’s unique ability to keep accumulating new information from one generation to the next.  Unlike man, animals are totally incapable of transmitting new information from one generation to the next.  It is true that many animals have some very meticulous and complicated social activities, but these are a part of their inherent instincts and remain unchanged from generation to generation.

 

The Race Factor

 

The various races among human beings present another problem for the evolutionist.  The races of men are considered by evolutionists to be the “sub species” of the species “Homo sapien.”  The early patriarchs of evolution did not have as difficult a task in attempting to explain races as modern evolutionists do.  They were convinced that the various races of men were all at different levels of superiority or inferiority in their evolutionary struggle for “survival of the fittest.”  This view is evident in their early writings.  Consider these words of Charles Darwin from one of his published letters:  “The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence.  Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”*  Consider also these words of the famous evolutionist, Thomas Huxley.  “No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average Negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man.”** 

The founding fathers of evolution were, for the most part, racists.  Modern evolutionists, as a whole, do not believe that any race of man is superior to another.  They believe that the races of mankind diverged from an early human population which came from one common ancestor rather than from a variety of different pre-human ancestors.  However, this modern evolutionary view presents a problem because; if all men have a common ancestry, why are there so many physical differences among races? 

Some evolutionists agree that in order to achieve the genetic variations that are characteristic in races, the early human ancestral population would have somehow had to have been divided into very small groups and segregated from the main population.  This would allow some of the recessive genetic traits to become evident because the groups would be forced to reproduce by inbreeding for a while and the distinctive national traits would emerge quite rapidly.²⁶  Now the question is; if mankind originated together, how could the main population be forced or persuaded to divide into small and separate groups?  It would seem advantageous for survival to remain a part of the main progressive body or at least remain in contact with the main population which would minimize inbreeding. 

By evolutionary standards, the only way to achieve this segregation and inbreeding of small groups would involve a long time period with a separate history of “evolution” for different races at separate stages or points in time.  This type of reasoning, however, can also lead to racism because if each race has its own unique and separate history of evolution which produced physical differences, why wouldn’t differences in intellectual capacities have also been produced by evolutionary processes?

The creationist believes that the Bible provides the answer to the perplexing question of how races were formed.  The most effective and fastest way to divide a single group of people would be to destroy their ability to communicate with each other.  If the common language could be confounded, then people would unite with those to whom they were able to communicate.  This would force small populations to migrate away from each other and slowly re-establish their own civilization with whatever natural resources and individual talents were available to them.  Each new group would have to go through a “stone-age” type of transition period because it would take some time to re-establish some of the previous conveniences that were enjoyed by the main population before the dispersion occurred.

The Bible records an event in the eleventh chapter of Genesis in which the common language of mankind was supernaturally confounded by God.  The Bible states that the whole earth was of the same language and had congregated in an area of the mid-east called the land of Shinar which was later called Babylon.  It seems that human knowledge had increased greatly and the people of the earth had decided to construct a city and a special tower “whose top will reach into heaven” (Gen. 11:14).  This tower was probably a structure known as a “ziggurat” which was a specially designed building that was used in ancient astrology.  It is known that astrology originated in the area of ancient Babylon and many of these ziggurats have been excavated through archaeology. Apparently, the people of the earth had united in an effort which was contrary to God’s divine purpose and the best interests of mankind.  They were quite possibly attempting to become the masters and planners of their own destinies instead of relying upon fellowship and guidance from the Eternal Creator.  In any event, the Bible states that the common language was divided into many diverse languages and the people were scattered “over the face of the whole earth.”

The evidence of archaeology attests to the fact that the birth of civilization seems to have occurred in this general area of the middle-east.²⁷ After the dispersion, each small group would have tried to re-establish some form of civilization but they would first have to endure a period of primitive living until some of their previous conveniences and accomplishments could be re-established.  This phenomenon is also supported by facts of archaeology which show the rapid and almost simultaneous development of cultures around and away from the center of where the dispersion was supposed to have occurred.²⁸ Those settlements which were the greatest distance away from the center of dispersion took slightly longer to develop than those which were closest.  The smallest groups of people would have probably been forced to migrate the greatest distances because they would have been pushed out by the larger more powerful groups.  The smallest groups would have also encountered the most difficulty in trying to reestablish some form of civilization because their combined talents and knowledge would have been greatly limited. 

If the average person in our modern technological world were suddenly, and completely cut off from civilization; and, forced to start a new life in some wilderness; that person would have to survive in a very primitive manner because our advanced lifestyle is dependent upon many individual contributions and the cumulative knowledge of society as a whole.  The fact that such a person would be forced to live a primitive life does not mean that his capacity for learning is any less than that of a person in a more advanced society.

Regardless of the physical and social differences that exist among the races of men, the Bible makes it perfectly clear that all people of all nations are of one basic and unique “kind” in the eyes of God.  The twenty-sixth verse of the seventeenth chapter of Acts states:  “God hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed and the bounds of their habitation.”  Racism is certainly not a Biblical concept.  The roots of racism, however, are deeply implanted in the theory of evolution.

 

That Old Time Religion

 

The religious nature of human beings presents another great difficulty for evolution.  Archaeology has revealed that even the most ancient cultures practiced some form of religion.  Throughout history, people have prayed, worshiped deity, and have had an anticipation of an afterlife which is reflected in the ceremonial activities that accompany the death of a loved one.  There is an obvious intrinsic spiritual nature which separates man from animal.  Certain people attempt to suppress or conceal this inherent nature by adopting philosophies which reject the concept of a God; however, a close scrutinization of these philosophies will usually reveal that they in themselves form a religion because they incorporate a system of standards, ethics, ideals, moral values, and ultimate interpretations of life.  A cognizant human being cannot hide from the fact that he or she has a consciousness which animals do not possess.

The Bible has some important words for those who deny the existence of God.  Consider these words in the first chapter of the book of Romans:  “…that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them.  For since the creation of the world his invisible attributes, his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.  For even though they knew God, they did not honor him as God, or give thanks; but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools.” (Rom. 1:19 - 22).

The most vital and most controversial of all questions pertaining to the origin of life is the question of whether man is a product of evolution or special creation.  Is man merely a higher animal or is he separate and unique from all other forms of life on earth?  It is obvious that a person’s self-image has a direct influence upon his actual character.  The person who considers himself or herself to be a special created being with a definite purpose in life and a responsibility toward an omnipotent, personal God, will more than likely have a different expression of behavior than the person who thinks of himself as being a higher animal, a chance product of evolution who is involved in the short struggle for existence.

Population

 

The world today contains approximately 4½ billion people.  The average worldwide population growth rate is at approximately 2 percent per year which means that there is an average of 3.6 children for every family on earth.²⁹  The world population 2,000 years ago was only about 130 million which means that today’s population is thirty times greater than it was just 2,000 years ago.  Because of population statistics, the evolutionist is faced with another major problem in his theory.  The creationist encounters no such difficulty with population figures because they coincide with the theory of special creation much better than with the theory of evolution.

According to the theory of special creation, the universal flood must have occurred anywhere from 4,000 to 8,000 years ago.  It can be mathematically calculated that the current population of 4½ billion could be produced from just two people in a four thousand year period with an average annual growth rate of only ½ percent.  In other words, instead of the current 3.6 average of children per family, it would only take 2.5 children per family to reach the current population figures in four thousand years.³⁰ (This is assuming that each generation only lived to be forty years old and died before any grandchildren were born.)  Therefore, in just 100 generations, a growth rate of ½ percent per year or ¼ of the current annual growth rate is all that would be required to produce the present population in four thousand years.  This conservative growth rate would easily compensate for any long adverse effects upon population which may have resulted from wars, famines, or diseases.³¹

The evolutionist believes that man has been around for at least one million years and some evolutionists are convinced that he has walked the earth for almost three million years.  By using the same conservative growth rate of ½ percent per year, it can be calculated that in one million years or 25,000 generations, starting from just two people, the population would be greater than 10²¹⁰⁰ which of course is an impossibility.³²  Most people have no realization of just how large 10²¹⁰⁰ is.  One billion would be represented by the number “one” which would be followed by nine zeros, or it could be written as l0⁹.  The number 10²¹⁰⁰ would be represented by the number “one” followed by 2,100 zeros!  How large is that?  Well, just consider that in a single drop of water there are more than 100 billion billion atoms.  A hydrogen atom is the smallest of all atoms yet it is still more than a thousand times greater than an electron.  If the entire universe was filled to its capacity with electrons, it could only hold 10¹³⁰ of these tiny atomic components.  This calculation is taken from the book, Scientific Creationism, by Dr. Henry Morris and it is based upon the assumption that the universe extends for a distance of five billion light years.³³ (A light year is the distance that light can travel in a one year period at a speed of 186, 000 miles per second).  It is obvious that if the universe could only hold 10¹³⁰ electrons, then the population of the world could never attain a number like 10²¹⁰⁰.  The reason for these ridiculous mathematical computations is to demonstrate that the earth should have reached its potential capacity for people many hundreds of thousands of years ago. 

UPDATE: Because of advances in technology, some believe that the observable universe stretches to a size of nearly 100 billion light years. This calculation of course assumes that the speed of light has always been constant. Refer to reference section; Part II, Chapter II, Notes 21& 22)

The evolutionist claims that growth rates were much less in man’s early years because of adverse conditions but such an assumption is ludicrous.  Since we know that the population of the earth 2,000 years ago was only 130 million, the 998,000 years prior to this time would have had an inconceivable mortality rate.  Even if the growth rate during the past million years had miraculously been small enough to produce the current population of 4½ billion, it would still mean that a minimum of 3,000 billion people would have had to live and die during this long period.³⁴ If this were true, why would human fossils be so rare?  Why wouldn’t archaeology have any evidence of the many cultures which must have existed in the past? Once again, the observable facts are in favor of the creationist theory.  The evolutionist has to provide more “poor excuses” to account for the facts. (By Robert Linkey)

 

The Truth:

 

“Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth." (Genesis 1: 26-28)

 

“When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers, The moon and the stars, which You have ordained; What is man that You take thought of him, And the son of man that You care for him? Yet You have made him a little lower than God, And You crown him with glory and majesty! You make him to rule over the works of Your hands; You have put all things under his feet, All sheep and oxen, And also the beasts of the field, The birds of the heavens and the fish of the sea, Whatever passes through the paths of the seas. O LORD, our Lord, How majestic is Your name in all the earth! (Psalm 8: 3-9)

 

“Scripture quotations taken from the NASB.”

Is the Bible Truth or Myth?       Is Jesus God, Man or Both?         Is Jesus Dead or Alive?
Is Jesus Coming Back Again?      Is God Cruel or Loving?             Is the Gospel even Real?
Is Heaven Attained by Works?   Many Pathways to Heaven?      Is the Bible Against Science?
Evolution Improves with Time?    Fossils Prove Evolution?           Missing Link Ape-Men?
Origin of Life by Chance?           Reference & Note Section     Bible Truth or Myth? Synopsis
Jesus God Man Both? Synopsis  Jesus Dead or Alive? Synopsis  Jesus Coming Again? Synopsis
Is God Cruel or Loving? Synopsis    Is the Gospel Real? Synopsis  Heaven by Works? Synopsis
Many Paths to Heaven? Synopsis Bible v Science? Synopsis Evolution Improves Life?Synopsis
Fossils Prove Evolution? Synopsis  Missing Link Ape-Men? Synopsis Life by Chance? Synopsis

Table of Contents         Contact the Author          Other Recommended Study Resources
 
"Lies & Deception" Main Website